After reading the articles of all the links included in this
blog, I realized that the issue of crime in sport is a lot more complicated
than I thought. Each of the links seemed to focus on something different: how
the NFL deals with crimes and how the punishment wasn’t harsh enough, how the
public should respect the privacy of women and how the Janay Rice video shouldn’t
have been publicized, and how the public reacts more harshly towards crimes
committed by black athletes than white athletes. There’s so many factors
involved in the discussion of Ray Rice’s particular incident and how it is
talked about in media.
I think Ray Rice’s incident is reflective of broader trends
in US sport, but I think it received a great amount of attention than previous
cases of domestic violence. According to the New York Times, domestic violence
is actually the most common reason for arrest among NFL athletes, even though
the rate of committing this crime is less than the national average (Irwin,
2014). Despite it being lower than the national average, NFL players, as famous
athletes that we watch on tv and look up to, should be held to a higher
standard anyway. Other NFL players that have been convicted of murder or
assault are Josh Brent, and Dwayne Goodrich, and these are only the big name
ones that received long periods of probation. As one of authors of the link
mentioned, there was visual and graphic evidence of Ray Rice’s crime, and his
ethnicity might have had something to do with the heightened discussion of his
actions. Also, the NFL’s punishment that many believe wasn’t harsh enough
brought the issue even more attention, and it brought negative attention to the
NFL as an industry as well.
Right now, it seems like there is media that both downplays
Ray Rice’s actions as well as media that criticizes his actions. (I don’t know
if it’s because the media that I’m exposed to has changed since the start of
taking this class). For the most part though, I think both the NFL and media
have downplayed the situation and have made it seem like it is not a big deal
for good NFL players to be committing these kinds of crimes. Through this, the media
reinforces that it is acceptable for these types of actions to be done if the
offender is an athlete or someone of value to the NFL industry. It is promoting
the notion that if you are talented in the way of what society values (you are
good at making touchdowns or throwing the football), then you won’t get
punished as harshly for committing domestic violence offenses.
These trends in criminal activity that are broadcasted about
more often than these crimes committed by “regular” people (non-athletes) might
be a result of the common nature of the background of these athletes. One of
the links had an article that lightly touched on this, and it discussed how an
upbringing of athletic success is coupled with a sense of entitlement, and the
notion that one matters more than others and is valued more because of one’s
athletic ability.
IRWIN, N. (2014,
September 13). The Numbers Game. New York Times. p. D1.C
Regarding these specific types of crimes (DV, assault, etc), do you think the very nature of sports like football lends itself to committing them, or do you think it's more just about the sense of entitlement that you mentioned at the end?
ReplyDelete-C. Salazar
^ Isn't it pretty obvious that violence is inherent in sports like football? I totally agree with the idea that particular organizations like the NFL downplay the situation when they should be ambassadors for the cause, for the change.
ReplyDeleteDustin Willey.
Deadline: 1/1
ReplyDeleteComment: 1/1
Quality: 2/3
Total: 4/5
Good job providing your opinion on the first couple parts of the prompt, however I would have liked to see you go a little more in depth regarding the last part of the prompt and why these certain crimes are more prominent. You mentioned entitlement, but what about these athletes feeling "entitled" is causing these issues?
~Brittainy